The shape stays the same, the target moves
William Morris built the Arts and Crafts movement in the 1880s on a single conviction: the factory didn't just produce ugly objects, it produced diminished people. Strip a craftsman of the struggle and you strip him of meaning. Carlo Petrini made the same argument a century later when he founded Slow Food in 1986, protesting a McDonald's opening near the Spanish Steps in Rome. Punk refused to make music polished. Brutalism refused to make buildings pleasant. Every generation produces a faction that looks at the dominant system's definition of progress and says no.
What changes is the target. The thing being resisted now is not the factory or fast food or corporate rock. It is the algorithmic organization of daily life itself. Anna Wiener, the former tech worker who wrote Uncanny Valley, described Silicon Valley's animating vision as a world freed of decision-making, human behavior whittled to the fastest, simplest, sleekest versions of itself so everything could be optimized. Frictionmaxxing is the first popular term that names the refusal of that vision. Which is why it matters. And which is exactly why its contradictions matter more.
Inconvenience as product
The UK fragrance house Ffern is the case study everyone reaches for. It releases scents seasonally, maintains a waitlist for membership, offers no year-round availability, and makes instant checkout impossible. The inconvenience is the product. You are buying the experience of not being able to buy perfume whenever you want. Ffern has cultivated a devoted following precisely because its friction signals something the rest of the market has forgotten: someone, somewhere, cared enough to slow down.
Comme des Garçons has operated on this principle for decades. Rei Kawakubo's Dover Street Market locations are intentionally disorienting, raw concrete retail spaces that refuse conventional merchandising logic. The clothes are asymmetric, confrontational, sometimes unwearable. The friction is the foundational design philosophy.
But. Ffern's waitlist is scarcity economics with better typography. Comme des Garçons' difficulty is luxury positioning through inaccessibility. The philosopher Shannon Vallor coined "moral de-skilling" to describe how automating everyday decisions erodes our capacity for judgment, empathy, patience. Frictionmaxxing borrows that critique and wears it well. The commercial applications, though, don't restore moral skill. They monetize the appearance of having it. A six-month waitlist doesn't teach you patience. It teaches you that your patience has a price, and that price is the brand's margin.
The suffix gives it away
The deepest irony lives in the word itself. "Maxxing" comes from internet bodybuilding and incel culture. Looksmaxxing. Moneymaxxing. Optimization vocabularies for optimizing the self. The word frictionmaxxing carries the logic of optimization inside a concept that claims to reject optimization. You cannot maximize friction without treating friction as a metric. The moment friction becomes a metric, it becomes something to perform, to post about, to buy. The four-hundred-dollar hand-poured candle with a six-month waitlist. The custom ceramic mug that takes eight weeks. The slowly curated home that requires years of disposable income and discretionary time. Baltimore designer Robin Heller told Architectural Digest that custom pieces become heirlooms, that the wait is always worth it. She's right. She's also describing a luxury most people cannot access.
Dazed Magazine ran the headline frictionmaxxing's advocates have not answered: "Wait, whose life is frictionless?" For a single mother navigating a public transit system designed without her in mind, life is already saturated with friction. For a person with a disability encountering a website that lacks basic accessibility, friction is not a philosophical position. It is a barrier. UX design spent two decades reducing friction not because designers lacked imagination, but because friction literally excludes people. Screen readers require simplicity. Simplified navigation serves people with cognitive disabilities. Clear visual hierarchies are the infrastructure of inclusive design. Choosing inconvenience is only radical if convenience was yours to give up.
The speed of absorption is the point
Jezer-Morton's original provocation was structural. She argued that tech companies had succeeded in making life itself feel like the problem: reading too slow, talking too awkward, thinking too hard. Forbes writer Kevin Kruse reframed that structural critique as a productivity technique. Architectural Digest turned it into a decorating philosophy. The critique became a lifestyle. A parenting columnist wrote an essay about putting her phone down and paying attention to the texture of daily life, and within two months that impulse had a brand strategy, a decorating trend, and a Forbes byline.
The diagnosis frictionmaxxing carries is correct. Algorithmic life does flatten taste, erode agency, and produce what Harper's Bazaar fashion director Chloe King called "expansive and numbing sameness." But the speed at which a critique of speed was optimized into content is not a flaw in the discourse. It is the discourse. It is the thing frictionmaxxing was trying to name, happening to frictionmaxxing, in real time, and the people buying the four-hundred-dollar candle are funding the very machine they believe they're resisting.
If this is the kind of thinking that sharpens how you see design and culture, subscribe to The Threads of Culture newsletter for new writing every week.